CYKE Falcon S vs CYKE Falcon X
On the numbers that decide this pair, the CYKE Falcon S is 14 km further on range than the CYKE Falcon X. Everything else is below, including where it loses.
Range is our estimate under the reference ride, not the manufacturer's claim. Cost is over 5 years at 3,000 km a year, on the same formula the cost-of-ownership calculator runs. How we work this out
| Spec | CYKE Falcon S | CYKE Falcon X |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated range | 70 km | 56 km |
| Battery | 960 Wh | 960 Wh |
| Weight | 24.9 kg | 20.9 kg |
| Motor torque | 160 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Top speed | 45 km/h | 45 km/h |
| Price | $2,999 | $2,999 |
| 5-year cost | $3,308 | $3,308 |
Where each one wins
- CYKE Falcon S is 14 km further on range.
- CYKE Falcon X is 4.0 kg lighter.
The CYKE Falcon S leads on 1 of these, the CYKE Falcon X on 1. Neither sweeps it, so the choice comes down to which of those you actually use.
What each one costs to own
Over 5 years the two land within 5% of each other, which is inside the error on any of these inputs. Cost is not the deciding factor here.
That figure moves mostly on the battery. The CYKE Falcon S covers about 51,200 km before its pack is due for replacement; the CYKE Falcon X, about 51,200 km. Ride less than that and the replacement never enters the sum.
Run these numbers on your own mileage
Which one to buy
- Pick the CYKE Falcon S if you ride to the edge of the battery and dislike planning around it.
- Pick the CYKE Falcon X if you carry the bike up steps, onto a train, or into a flat.
Verdict
There is no verdict to give. The CYKE Falcon S and the CYKE Falcon X are the same bike to within the precision of anything we can measure, so buy whichever is cheaper on the day.
Range here is an estimate under one reference ride, not a measurement. Yours will differ with terrain, weight, tyres and weather, which is what the range calculator is for.
Tell me when either of these gets cheaper
One email when a price moves on a bike you are watching. Nothing else.