Cyrusher Ranger vs Cyrusher Trax
The Cyrusher Ranger and the Cyrusher Trax are close enough that no single figure decides it. The table below shows every axis, and the differences that are inside the margin are marked as ties rather than dressed up as wins.
Range is our estimate under the reference ride, not the manufacturer's claim. Cost is over 5 years at 3,000 km a year, on the same formula the cost-of-ownership calculator runs. How we work this out
| Spec | Cyrusher Ranger | Cyrusher Trax |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated range | 61 km | 61 km |
| Battery | 1040 Wh | 1040 Wh |
| Weight | 22.7 kg | 22.7 kg |
| Motor torque | 80 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Top speed | 45 km/h | 45 km/h |
| Price | $2,599 | $2,299 |
| 5-year cost | $3,005 | $2,779 |
Where each one wins
Nothing separates the Cyrusher Ranger and the Cyrusher Trax by more than the margin on our own estimate. On the numbers, this is one bike sold under two names.
What each one costs to own
Over 5 years the Cyrusher Trax costs about 209 EUR less to own, once purchase, charging, servicing, a battery replacement where one is due, and resale are all counted.
That figure moves mostly on the battery. The Cyrusher Ranger covers about 55,467 km before its pack is due for replacement; the Cyrusher Trax, about 55,467 km. Ride less than that and the replacement never enters the sum.
Run these numbers on your own mileage
Which one to buy
- Pick the Cyrusher Trax if the five-year total is what you are optimising.
Verdict
On the measured axes the Cyrusher Trax is the better buy, and the Cyrusher Ranger needs a reason of its own: a colour, a frame, a shop you trust, a price that moves. None of those are in our numbers, and all of them are legitimate.
Range here is an estimate under one reference ride, not a measurement. Yours will differ with terrain, weight, tyres and weather, which is what the range calculator is for.
Tell me when either of these gets cheaper
One email when a price moves on a bike you are watching. Nothing else.