Ridstar MN20 vs Ridstar Q20

Where each one wins

• Ridstar MN20 is 9.1 kg lighter.
• Ridstar Q20 is 240 Wh more battery.
• Ridstar Q20 is 5 km/h faster.
• Ridstar MN20 is 5 Nm more torque.

The Ridstar MN20 leads on 2 of these, the Ridstar Q20 on 2. Neither sweeps it, so the choice comes down to which of those you actually use.

What each one costs to own

Over 5 years the Ridstar MN20 costs about 189 EUR less to own, once purchase, charging, servicing, a battery replacement where one is due, and resale are all counted.

That figure moves mostly on the battery. The Ridstar MN20 covers about 38,400 km before its pack is due for replacement; the Ridstar Q20, about 51,200 km. Ride less than that and the replacement never enters the sum.

Run these numbers on your own mileage

Which one to buy

• Pick the Ridstar Q20 if you would rather charge less often than carry less weight.
• Pick the Ridstar MN20 if you carry the bike up steps, onto a train, or into a flat.
• Pick the Ridstar MN20 if your route has real hills, or you carry cargo or a passenger.
• Pick the Ridstar Q20 if your commute has fast stretches where the assist cutting out matters.
• Pick the Ridstar MN20 if the five-year total is what you are optimising.

Verdict

On the measured axes the Ridstar MN20 is the better buy, and the Ridstar Q20 needs a reason of its own: a colour, a frame, a shop you trust, a price that moves. None of those are in our numbers, and all of them are legitimate.

Range here is an estimate under one reference ride, not a measurement. Yours will differ with terrain, weight, tyres and weather, which is what the range calculator is for.