Velowave Ranger 2 vs Velowave Ranger 2 Fat
On the numbers that decide this pair, the Velowave Ranger 2 is 10.4 kg lighter than the Velowave Ranger 2 Fat. Everything else is below, including where it loses.
Range is our estimate under the reference ride, not the manufacturer's claim. Cost is over 5 years at 3,000 km a year, on the same formula the cost-of-ownership calculator runs. How we work this out
| Spec | Velowave Ranger 2 | Velowave Ranger 2 Fat |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated range | 42 km | 41 km |
| Battery | 720 Wh | 720 Wh |
| Weight | 25.4 kg | 35.8 kg |
| Motor torque | 86 Nm | 86 Nm |
| Top speed | 45 km/h | 45 km/h |
| Price | $1,699 | $1,699 |
| 5-year cost | $2,324 | $2,324 |
Where each one wins
- Velowave Ranger 2 is 10.4 kg lighter.
The Velowave Ranger 2 Fat does not lead on a single measured axis here. That does not make it the wrong bike, but it does mean the Velowave Ranger 2 is the one to justify not buying.
Who each one is for
Velowave Ranger 2
Suits you if you want:
- 86 Nm of torque, which is steep-hill territory
- fast class, which keeps up with city traffic
- rated to 150 kg of rider and luggage together
- about 42 km estimated, which covers a 21 km each-way commute
What it asks in return:
- fast class, so it is registered and helmeted in most places
Velowave Ranger 2 Fat
Suits you if you want:
- 86 Nm of torque, which is steep-hill territory
- fast class, which keeps up with city traffic
- rated to 150 kg of rider and luggage together
- about 41 km estimated, which covers a 20 km each-way commute
What it asks in return:
- 35.8 kg, which is a bike you park rather than carry
- fast class, so it is registered and helmeted in most places
Each line above is read straight from the specification: torque, weight, payload, battery and our range estimate. Nothing here is a preference, and neither bike is being recommended over the other.
What each one costs to own
Over 5 years the two land within 5% of each other, which is inside the error on any of these inputs. Cost is not the deciding factor here.
That figure moves mostly on the battery. The Velowave Ranger 2 covers about 38,400 km before its pack is due for replacement; the Velowave Ranger 2 Fat, about 38,400 km. Ride less than that and the replacement never enters the sum.
| Over five years | Velowave Ranger 2 | Velowave Ranger 2 Fat |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase price | $1,699 | $1,699 |
| Charging | $68 | $68 |
| Servicing | $972 | $972 |
| Battery replacement | ||
| Resale value | $-415 | $-415 |
| Total | $2,324 | $2,324 |
Run these numbers on your own mileage
Which one to buy
- Pick the Velowave Ranger 2 if you carry the bike up steps, onto a train, or into a flat.
Verdict
On the measured axes the Velowave Ranger 2 is the better buy, and the Velowave Ranger 2 Fat needs a reason of its own: a colour, a frame, a shop you trust, a price that moves. None of those are in our numbers, and all of them are legitimate.
Range here is an estimate under one reference ride, not a measurement. Yours will differ with terrain, weight, tyres and weather, which is what the range calculator is for.
Tell me when either of these gets cheaper
One email when a price moves on a bike you are watching. Nothing else.