VIVI FM20UL vs VIVI MT20UL
The VIVI FM20UL and the VIVI MT20UL are close enough that no single figure decides it. The table below shows every axis, and the differences that are inside the margin are marked as ties rather than dressed up as wins.
Range is our estimate under the reference ride, not the manufacturer's claim. Cost is over 5 years at 3,000 km a year, on the same formula the cost-of-ownership calculator runs. How we work this out
| Spec | VIVI FM20UL | VIVI MT20UL |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated range | 27 km | 27 km |
| Battery | 374 Wh | 374 Wh |
| Weight | 22.7 kg | 22.7 kg |
| Motor torque | 40 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Top speed | 32 km/h | 32 km/h |
| Price | $530 | $560 |
| 5-year cost | $1,117 | $1,139 |
Where each one wins
Nothing separates the VIVI FM20UL and the VIVI MT20UL by more than the margin on our own estimate. On the numbers, this is one bike sold under two names.
What each one costs to own
Over 5 years the two land within 5% of each other, which is inside the error on any of these inputs. Cost is not the deciding factor here.
That figure moves mostly on the battery. The VIVI FM20UL covers about 19,947 km before its pack is due for replacement; the VIVI MT20UL, about 19,947 km. Ride less than that and the replacement never enters the sum.
Run these numbers on your own mileage
Which one to buy
Verdict
There is no verdict to give. The VIVI FM20UL and the VIVI MT20UL are the same bike to within the precision of anything we can measure, so buy whichever is cheaper on the day.
Range here is an estimate under one reference ride, not a measurement. Yours will differ with terrain, weight, tyres and weather, which is what the range calculator is for.
Tell me when either of these gets cheaper
One email when a price moves on a bike you are watching. Nothing else.